Obama Cabinet Watch: Someone is going to be very disappointed
We still don’t have a very clear picture of what Obama’s North Korea policy is going to be, but the North Koreans apparently have high expectations, as does one of its most prominent U.S. sympathizers, Professor Han S. Park. Park, writing in the Korea Times, says Team Obama met with the North Koreans recently and promised a “dramatic stride toward diplomatic normalization.” Oh, and the Americans will also demand that North Korea give up its nuclear weapons.
Some day.
This would mean that North Korea would have achieved all of its demands for no significant performance whatsoever and leave the next Secretary of State nothing to negotiate with. Hillary Clinton may be many things, for better or for worse, but she strikes me as a better negotiator than this.
Is this kind of preemptive capitulation possible in an atmosphere where North Korea’s version of disarmament means it keeps its nuclear weapons, its fissile material, its bigger reactors, its uranium program, its concentration camps, its supernote factories, and its proliferation rackets … and denies that we can conduct verification in any real sense? The early signals from Obama’s nominations don’t suggest that our foreign policies will be built around complete prostration to our enemies, and I can state on good authority — a source who prefers to remain off-record — that Park is at least half full of shit here.
If Park also happens to be half right about this, it will be interesting to see whether Republicans who sat on their hands throughout Team Bush’s total sellout suddenly become strident supporters of the national interest who denounce the new administration’s “appeasement.” And as disingenuous as that would be, it sure beats the alternative of them continuing to slumber as our diplomatic incompetence transforms a starving, tin-pot tyranny into a major nuclear power and proliferator.
As of today, however, one can plausibly hope that Obama’s North Korea policy will be vastly less awful and more competent than Bush’s.
…In fact, Park met with Jannuzi before his trip to North Korea where he stayed from Oct. 28 to Nov. 1.
Fresh from his North Korean visit, Park shared his view on how North Korean nuclear saga will proceed under Obama’s helm…
I think it’s Park, who is not on the Obama team, and not Jannuzi, who is, that “met with the North Koreans”.
Obama’s people, specifically Jannuzi, did meet with the North Koreans in New York. I should have linked to this in my post above; that would have been clearer. Otherwise, Park is only speaking for what Park himself had worked out with the North Koreans, not for what Obama’s people were inclined to propose. If Park were only speaking for Park, it wouldn’t be newsworthy. Park is trying to say more than that, though he’s trying to be coy about it. The whole problem I have with Park and the interview is Park’s suggestion that he speaks for the new administration. I question that suggestion.