Equality Begins Where Dependence Ends

South Korea, which spent the better part of the last two decades bitching that it wanted to be treated like America’s equal, has been bitching ever since the Pentagon decided that Korea was just about ready to take over wartime operational control of its own military, you know … for its own defense. Needless to say, and largely as a result of having served in the USFK myself for four years, I’m neither as sympathetic nor as diplomatic as our C.G.:

“We are still responsible to come and help defend this great country,” Army Gen. Walter Sharp said. “And what I’m going to do is to take this year and educate the folks of South Korea as to what these transitions mean.”

Some South Koreans also worry another change the U.S. is making–extending typical troop assignments to up to three years and allowing more personnel to bring their families with them–will lead to a reduction in the roughly 28,000 U.S. troops currently stationed there. Both changes began several years ago after prolonged negotiations between Seoul and Washington. But they have been opposed by many South Koreans, including conservative politicians and military retirees who say any changes will leave the country vulnerable to attack by North Korea. [WSJ, Evan Ramstad]

I give up. They don’t want us to bring our families, but they don’t want young, single soldiers chasing “their” women in Hongdae, either. (For the record, when I was in Korea, there was also a widely violated general order against sex in the barracks; also, I preferred the more bookish girls in Shin’chon and Suktae, but that’s another story).

Maybe the ROK Defense Ministry would be willing to hire scantily clad greeters to drape each incoming American soldier with a floral lei and present him with a monogrammed bottle of personal lubricant. Which isn’t to say that I’m a fan of putting more American civilians inside Nodong range, either.

0Shares

3 Responses

  1. Joshua wrote:

    I give up. They don’t want us to bring our families, but they don’t want young, single soldiers chasing “their” women in Hongdae, either.

    Is that the same “they”?

  2. Actually I meant that as a serious question. Often people are griping about supposed “hypocrisy” among Koreans (or some group), when in fact their talking about two different groups.

    If someone were to, say, gripe about Koreans saying how they first wanted wartime operational control and now they say they don’t want it, that would be a case of two different “theys.”

    But this is a case — they don’t want USFK personnel running amok in Korea but they don’t want personnel hanging around with their family and turning soft — where it could very well be the same “they.”

    I could see, though, why you might think my question was a rhetorical dig.