South Korea Launches More Feel-Good Exercises

Here we go again!

South Korea moved hundreds of troops, fighter jets, tanks and attack helicopters near the heavily armed border with the North in preparation for massive new military drills as tensions continue to simmer following last month’s North Korean artillery attack that left four dead.

“We will completely punish the enemy if it provokes us again like the shelling of Yeonpyeong Island,” said Brig. Gen. Ju Eun-sik, chief of the army’s 1st armored brigade, according to The Associated Press. [Stars & Stripes]

Isn’t it remarkable how quickly the South Koreans learned to talk smack, just like North Koreans? For its part, the USFK says it’s not playing, and that’s just fine with me.

The firing drills Thursday near the Koreas’ land border will be the biggest-ever wintertime joint firing exercise that South Korea’s army and air force have staged, an army statement said. [USA Today]

I’m sure that shows of force play well in the tabangs and around padok games in South Korea these days:

Opinion surveys since the Nov. 23 attack found sharp jumps in negative sentiments toward North Korea, particularly among young adults who are normally less interested in politics and are two generations removed from the Korean War of the 1950s. The ratings of President Lee initialy took a hit amid perceptions of a weak response to the attack.

A survey done by Realmeter, one of South Korea’s largest market researchers, on Saturday and Sunday found that 67% of respondents favored going through with the military drill that Seoul carried out Monday. Government officials argued they needed to proceed with the drill to prevent North Korea’s attack from creating a de facto change in a maritime boundary. “We have put up with North Korea’s occasional provocations for decades,” said Park Sun-min, chief executive of Min Consulting, a political consulting firm in Seoul. “Now we’ve reached a level where we can’t do that anymore even if that means we might endure some limited warfare on our land.”

The drill may help Mr. Lee’s ratings recover, but Mr. Park said it was too early to tell. Some opposition party politicians before the drill urged Mr. Lee to call it off, citing the risk of escalation in the conflict. But the anger and wariness hasn’t necessarily translated into more fear among South Koreans. The Realmeter survey found that only 25% of respondents believed that North Korea would carry out its threats to attack if the drill happened. [Wall Street Journal, Evan Ramstad]

One thing I’ll say for these exercises — they’re a vast improvement over the saccharine hippie bong resin that South Koreans positively ejaculated all over each other in the 90’s. Yes, it really was that sickening. I hope these exercises will have some beneficial effect on ROKA readiness, but I doubt they’ll do much to deter the North Koreans or advance us toward solving the greater problem. I also doubt that the North Koreans are done provoking the South. Hopefully, the exercises themselves will pass without a serious incident. The North Koreans don’t really specialize in confronting people with guns anymore. Instead, they specialize in attacking the weak, the defenseless, or those who for whatever reason aren’t expecting to be attacked. The North Koreans know they can’t win symmetrically, so they fight asymmetrically. That’s another concept the South Koreans should learn from the North, because when they do, it will be a game-changer.

0Shares

8 Responses

  1. > That’s another concept the South Koreans should learn from the North, because when they do, it will be a game-changer.

    There is fine line between terrorism and asymmetrical warfare, and that game will not be an easy one, I think.

  2. If we ever get around to supporting asymmetric warfare against DPRK, we have to understand, we won’t have much control over the asymmetric warriors. They may do things that we would condemn as terrorism. Then we have to ask ourselves, “Are we doing more good or more harm?” And we have to think of something to say to decent people around the world, not to mention the Russian and Chinese governments.

  3. To the Russian and Chinese Governments we could say “See why Communism is a failure”. The first metnioned at least had the balls enough to bail out and leave the latter in Debt more than America owes it…

  4. If America goes Broke, China starves again. If China goes Broke, America continues to gets fatter while released from Maoist Debt, finding other holders that will gladly accept U.S. spending debt. However, If Americans ever starved as a nation from lack of food, then the United States would have already detroyed the entire world by then. Any nation that has landed on Earth’s moon and sent domestic robots to distant asteroids and Mars, which are, at this moment still traversing them collecting data sent back to NASA. The United States by all calculations is not just “any” nation. Even when she appears to be broke, she is more wealthier than any ally or adversary. If the U,S, Dollar falls, the world followed suit first, save our cousins across the pond.

  5. I thought it was more like 2000-07 when the “saccharine hippie bong resin” (classic!) flowed so freely in Seoul. Relative hardliner Kim Young-sam ran the show from 1993-98.

  6. Fair point. I suppose I meant after my arrival in 1998, and also, isn’t there some odd rule by which 2000 was also part of the 90’s? Still, I’ll agree that the wierdest times on the Korean Street were 1998 to 2006 or so, when it began to taper off a bit.

  7. Joshua Stanton, here’s the odd rule. There was no year zero, so the first century was 1 – 100, the second was 101 – 200, … the twentieth was 1901 – 2000. But don’t worry, you can lead a productive, fulfilling life oblivious to this rule.