The Times and Terror
I admit it’s newsworthy, but how newsworthy does it have to be when there’s a very real risk that printing a news story can get people killed and advance the plans of murderers? That’s my question on the NY Times publication of fine-point details of how the CIA moves high-value terrorist captures from place to place. I was just starting to think, “it’s as if the Times felt this was a distant and irrelevant brushfire war.” Naturally then, James Lileks...